National Research Council; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Computer Science and Telecommunications Board; Committee on Future Information Architectures, Processes, and Strategies for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; Edward H. Shortliffe and Lynette I. Millett, Editors
Institute of Medicine; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Committee on Living Well with Chronic Disease: Public Health Action to Reduce Disability and Improve Functioning and Quality of Life
Institute of Medicine; Board on Health Care Services; Committee on Defining and Revising an Essential Health Benefits Package for Qualified Health Plans; Cheryl Ulmer, Bernadette McFadden, and Cassandra Cacace, Rapporteurs
Institute of Medicine; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Committee on Guidance for Establishing Standards of Care for Use in Disaster Situations; Dan Hanfling, Bruce M. Altevogt, Kristin Viswanathan, and Lawrence O. Gostin, Editors
Conflict and Security Issues | Health and Medicine
Institute of Medicine; Board on Health Care Services; Committee on Defining and Revising an Essential Health Benefits Package for Qualified Health Plans; Cheryl Ulmer, John Ball, Elizabeth McGlynn, and Shadia Bel Hamdounia, Editors
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.