National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Institute for Laboratory Animal Research; Roundtable on Science and Welfare in Laboratory Animal Use; Patricia McAdams, Steven Olson, Lida Anestidou, and Jenna Ogilvie, Rapporteurs
National Academy of Sciences; Indian National Science Academy; Policy and Global Affairs; Committee on India-United States Cooperation on Challenges of Emerging Infections and Global Health Safety; Rita S. Guenther and Micah D. Lowenthal, Rapporteurs
National Academy of Sciences; National Research Council; Policy and Global Affairs; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Committee on International Security and Arms Control; Board on Life Sciences; Committee on Anticipating Biosecurity Challenges of the Global Expansion of High-Containment Biological Laboratories; Alison K. Hottes, Benjamin Rusek, and Fran Sharples, Rapporteurs
Biology and Life Sciences | Conflict and Security Issues
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Board on Earth Sciences and Resources; Institute for Laboratory Animal Research; Committee on Strengthening the Disaster Resilience of Academic Research Communities; Georges C. Benjamin, Lisa Brown, and Ellen Carlin, Editors
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.