National Research Council; Institute of Medicine; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology; Board on Life Sciences; Committee on Effectiveness of National Biosurveillance Systems: BioWatch and the Public Health System
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Policy and Global Affairs; Board on Life Sciences; Committee on Science, Technology, and Law; Committee on Review of the Scientific Approaches Used During the FBI's Investigation of the 2001 Bacillus anthracis Mailings
Biology and Life Sciences | Conflict and Security Issues | Math, Chemistry, and Physics
National Research Council; Chinese Academy of Sciences; IAP—The Global Network of Science Academies; International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; International Union of Microbiological Societies; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Life Sciences; Committee on Trends in Science and Technology Relevant to the Biological Weapons Convention: An International Workshop
Biology and Life Sciences | Conflict and Security Issues
National Research Council; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Board on Physics and Astronomy; Space Studies Board; Science Frontiers Panels; Program Prioritization Panels; Committee for a Decadal Survey of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.