National Research Council; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Committee on Law and Justice; Committee on National Statistics; National Materials Advisory Board; Committee to Assess the Feasibility, Accuracy, and Technical Capability of a National Ballistics Database; Daniel L. Cork, John E. Rolph, Eugene S. Meieran, and Carol V. Petrie, Editors
Behavioral and Social Sciences | Conflict and Security Issues
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Laboratory Assessments Board; Panel on Review of the Information Technology Laboratory at the National Institute of Standards and Technology; Committee on NIST Technical Programs
National Research Council; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board; Space Studies Board; Committee on National Statistics; Committee on Human Spaceflight
National Academy of Sciences; Policy and Global Affairs; Committee on International Security and Arms Control; Committee on Strengthening and Expanding the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.