National Research Council; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Space Studies Board; Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board; Committee for the Decadal Survey on Biological and Physical Sciences in Space
Institute of Medicine; Food and Nutrition Board; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Planning Committee for a Workshop on Potential Health Hazards Associated with Consumption of Caffeine in Food and Dietary Supplements; Leslie Pray, Ann L. Yaktine, and Diana Pankevich, Rapporteurs
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Institute of Medicine; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Committee to Review NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks; Carol E. H. Scott-Conner, Daniel R. Masys, and Catharyn T. Liverman, Editors
Institute of Medicine; Committee to Evaluate the Artificial Heart Program of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Division of Health Care Services; John R. Hogness and Malin VanAntwerp, Editors
National Research Council; Commission on Life Sciences; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Subcommittee on Guidelines for Developing Spacecraft Maximum Allowable Concentrations for Space Station Contaminants; Committee on Toxicology
Institute of Medicine; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Committee on Personal Protective Equipment for Healthcare Workers During an Influenza Pandemic; Lewis R. Goldfrank and Catharyn T. Liverman, Editors
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.