Institute of Medicine; Food and Nutrition Board; Subcommittee on Nutrition and Diarrheal Diseases Control; Subcommittee on Diet, Physical Activity, and Pregnancy Outcome; Committee on International Nutrition Programs
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Board on Health Care Services; Committee on Reproductive Health Services: Assessing the Safety and Quality of Abortion Care in the U.S.
Institute of Medicine; Food and Nutrition Board; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Planning Committee for a Workshop on Potential Health Hazards Associated with Consumption of Caffeine in Food and Dietary Supplements; Leslie Pray, Ann L. Yaktine, and Diana Pankevich, Rapporteurs
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Committee on Gulf War and Health, Volume 11: Generational Health Effects of Serving in the Gulf War
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Commission on Life Sciences; Subcommittee on Reproductive and Neurodevelopmental Toxicology; Committee on Biologic Markers
Behavioral and Social Sciences | Health and Medicine
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.