Institute of Medicine; Board on Health Care Services; Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research; Jill Eden, Laura Levit, Alfred Berg, and Sally Morton, Editors
National Research Council; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Board on Infrastructure and the Constructed Environment; Committee on Assessing the Results of External Independent Reviews for U.S. Department of Energy Projects
Energy and Energy Conservation | Industry and Labor
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Earth Sciences and Resources; Committee to Review the U.S. Geological Survey's Mineral Resources Program; Committee on Earth Resources
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Transportation Research Board; Strategic Highway Research Program; Strategic Highway Research Program Capacity Focus Area; Rogue Valley Council of Governments
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; National Materials and Manufacturing Board; Committee on DOD Engagement with Its Manufacturing USA MIIs Phase 2 Study
National Research Council; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Board on Science Education; Committee on Developing the Capacity to Select Effective Instructional Materials; Maxine Singer and Jan Tuomi, Editors
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.