National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Policy and Global Affairs; Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy; Committee on the Assessment of the SBIR and STTR Programs at NIH
National Research Council; Program on Forced Migration and Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University; Committee on Population; Roundtable on the Demography of Forced Migration; Dennis Dijkzeul and Caroline Lynch, Editors
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Transportation Research Board; Strategic Highway Research Program Renewal Focus Area; Adam Zofka; Maria Chrysochoou; Iliya Yut; Chad Johnston; Montgomery Shaw; Shih-Po Sun; James Mahoney; Stuart Farquharson; Michael Donahue
National Research Council; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Board; Laboratory Assessments Board; Committee on Review of Army Research Laboratory Programs for Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Institutions
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Committee on the Review of Specific Programs in the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.