National Research Council; Policy and Global Affairs; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Institute of Medicine; Board on Life Sciences; Board on Global Health; Committee on Science, Technology, and Law; Committee on Science, Technology, and Law; Forum on Microbial Threats; Karin Matchett, Anne-Marie Mazza, and Steven Kendall, Rapporteurs
Conflict and Security Issues | Health and Medicine
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; National Academy of Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Global Health; Committee on Addressing Issues of Vaccine Distribution and Supply Chains to Advance Pandemic and Seasonal Influenza Preparedness and Response; Ravi Anupindi, Prashant Yadav, Kenisha M.P. Jefferson, and Elizabeth Ashby, Editors
National Research Council; Policy and Global Affairs; Board on Higher Education and Workforce; Committee for the Evaluation of the Lucille P. Markey Programs in Biomedical Sciences; George R. Reinhart, Editor
Health and Medicine | Policy for Science and Technology
Institute of Medicine; Board on Global Health; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Committee on Measures to Enhance the Effectiveness of the CDC Quarantine Station Expansion Plan for U.S. Ports of Entry; Laura B. Sivitz, Kathleen Stratton, and Georges C. Benjamin, Editors
Health and Medicine | Transportation and Infrastructure
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.