National Research Council; Russian Academy of Sciences; Policy and Global Affairs; Office for Central Europe and Eurasia; Development, Security, and Cooperation; Committee on Cleaning Up of Radioactive Contamination: Russian Challenges and U.S. Experience; Glenn E. Schweitzer, Frank L. Parker, and Kelly Robbins, Editors
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Water Science and Technology Board; Committee on Improving the Next-Generation EPA Multi-Sector General Permit for Industrial Stormwater Discharges
National Research Council; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Board on Manufacturing and Engineering Design; Committee for Review of the Department of Energy's Industrial Technologies Program
Energy and Energy Conservation | Engineering and Technology | Industry and Labor
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Transportation Research Board; National Cooperative Railroad Research Program; Joseph L. Schofer; Breton L. Johnson; Norman Carlson; Derek Kit; Ho Cheah
National Research Council; Board on Army Science and Technology; Committee to Review and Assess Closure Plans for the Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility and the Chemical Agent and Munitions Disposal System
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Transportation Research Board; Airport Cooperative Research Program; Airport Cooperative Research Program Synthesis Program; Bryan O. Elliot; Robert B. “Rusty Chapman; ” and L. William Kelly
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.