National Research Council; Policy and Global Affairs; Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy; Committee on Science, Technology, and Law; Committee on Intellectual Property Rights in Genomic and Protein Research and Innovation; Stephen A. Merrill and Anne-Marie Mazza, Editors
Biology and Life Sciences | Policy for Science and Technology
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Radiation Effects Research; Committee to Review the CDC-NCI Feasibility Study of the Health Consequences from Nuclear Weapons Tests
Institute of Medicine; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Forum on Neuroscience and Nervous System Disorders; Forum on Drug Discovery, Development, and Translation; Sheena M. Posey Norris, Evelyn Strauss, Christopher DeFeo, and Clare Stroud, Rapporteurs
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Institute for Laboratory Animal Research; Roundtable on Science and Welfare in Laboratory Animal Use; Anne Frances Johnson and Lida Anestidou, Rapporteurs
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on the Health of Select Populations; Board on Health Care Services; Committee on the Evidence Base for Genetic Testing
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.