Institute of Medicine; Food and Nutrition Board; Panel on Micronutrients; Subcommittee on Upper Reference Levels of Nutrients; Subcommittee of Interpretation and Uses of Dietary Reference Intakes; Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes
National Research Council; Academy of Scientific Research and Technology (Cairo, Egypt); Institute of Nutrition/Ministry of Health (Cairo, Egypt); Board on Science and Technology for International Development; A. S. El Nockrashy Osman Galal and Jay Davenport, Editors
National Research Council; Institute of Medicine; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Global Health; Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources; Committee on Achieving Sustainable Global Capacity for Surveillance and Response to Emerging Diseases of Zoonotic Origin; Alexandra Beatty, Kimberly Scott, and Peggy Tsai, Rapporteurs
Institute of Medicine; Food and Nutrition Board; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Food Forum; Roundtable on Environmental Health Sciences, Research, and Medicine; Leslie Pray, Rapporteur
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Life Sciences; Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology; Committee on Proposal Evaluation for Allocation of Supercomputing Time for the Study of Molecular Dynamics, Ninth Round
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.