Institute of Medicine; Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention; Committee on Capitalizing on Social Science and Behavioral Research to Improve the Public's Health; Brian D. Smedley and S. Leonard Syme, Editors
National Research Council; Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications; Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Computer Science and Telecommunications Board; Committee on National Statistics; Committee on Computing and Communications Research to Enable Better Use of Information Technology in Government
Behavioral and Social Sciences | Computers and Information Technology | Surveys and Statistics
National Research Council; Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Institute of Medicine; Committee on Law and Justice; Board on Children, Youth, and Families; Panel on Juvenile Crime: Prevention, Treatment, and Control; Joan McCord, Cathy Spatz Widom, Melissa I. Bamba, and Nancy A. Crowell, Editors
National Research Council; Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Institute of Medicine; Board on Children, Youth, and Families; Committee on Community-Level Programs for Youth; Jennifer Appleton Gootman, Editor
Behavioral and Social Sciences | Health and Medicine
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Consensus Study Reports:
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.