%0 Book %A Transportation Research Board %A National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine %E Mills, Russell W. %E Heiks, Deminique %E Burns, Will %E Arnold, Sarah %E Gregory, Douglas %E Koester, Haylee %T Guide to Evaluating Airport Governance Structures %D 2022 %U https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/26808/guide-to-evaluating-airport-governance-structures %> https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/26808/guide-to-evaluating-airport-governance-structures %I The National Academies Press %C Washington, DC %G English %K Transportation and Infrastructure %P 98 %X Airports across the United States are owned and operated by a wide variety of governance structures, each with their own features and historical legacies. As the common refrain from airport professionals goes, if you’ve seen one airport, you’ve seen one airport. Similarly, if you’ve seen one airport’s governance structure, you’ve seen one airport’s governance structure. The TRB Airport Cooperative Research Program's ACRP Research Report 245: Guide to Evaluating Airport Governance Structures provides valuable tools to help communities evaluate the effectiveness of their current governance structure and consider alternative governance structures at airports. Supplemental to the report is a web app to search and query an online database of the key governance attributes of more than 98% of the airports in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS). %0 Book %A National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine %E Berger, Kavita %E Johnson, Anne %E Pavlin, Julie %E Vu, Nam %T Exploring Actions for Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness: Proceedings of a Symposium—in Brief %D 2023 %U https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/27226/exploring-actions-for-epidemic-and-pandemic-preparedness-proceedings-of-a %> https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/27226/exploring-actions-for-epidemic-and-pandemic-preparedness-proceedings-of-a %I The National Academies Press %C Washington, DC %G English %K Health and Medicine %P 12 %X Investing in pandemic preparedness ahead of disease outbreaks can greatly reduce the toll of epidemics and pandemics when they occur. Although several tools exist for assessing pandemic preparedness at an epidemiological and operational level, less information and fewer approaches are available to guide the prioritization of preparedness investments at the country level. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine held an international, virtual symposium series in May and June 2023 to explore possible strategies for evidence-based prioritization of global health capabilities to prepare for future epidemics and pandemics. Speakers and participants discussed assessment tools for national action planning; country and organizational decision-making about funding priorities; effective approaches for disease surveillance and risk communication; governance structures that support robust and reliable systems for global health investments; and specific actions for tools and resource prioritization for preventing and preparing for future epidemics and pandemics. This publication summarizes the presentation and discussions of the symposium. %0 Book %A Transportation Research Board %A National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine %E Wilhelmi, John %E Stein, Kaila %E Mitchell, Matthew %T Airport Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic %D 2023 %U https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/27075/airport-lessons-learned-from-the-covid-19-pandemic %> https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/27075/airport-lessons-learned-from-the-covid-19-pandemic %I The National Academies Press %C Washington, DC %G English %K Transportation and Infrastructure %P 118 %X During the COVID-19 pandemic, airports faced challenges such as implementing health protocols, accessing trusted information, accommodating social distancing, and using effective technologies to control the spread of the virus. Public health officials interviewed for this report acknowledged a potential conflict between sustaining airport operations and promoting travel on the one hand and the need to implement certain health protocols to prevent disease transmission on the other. They also noted that public health governance structures vary from one state to the next, which can affect how COVID-19 response efforts are carried out. ACRP Research Report 253: Airport Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic, from TRB's Airport Cooperative Research Program, is intended as a resource for continued response to COVID-19 and future communicable disease outbreaks. The report summarizes 124 interviews with representatives from 127 airports of all sizes and regions. %0 Book %A Transportation Research Board %A National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine %E Treboniak, Chelsea %T Airport Software Solutions and Services Sourcing %D 2022 %U https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/26735/airport-software-solutions-and-services-sourcing %> https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/26735/airport-software-solutions-and-services-sourcing %I The National Academies Press %C Washington, DC %G English %K Transportation and Infrastructure %P 150 %X The technology procurement process includes sourcing and acquiring software, hardware, and services. Systems and nuances of technology procurement vary within each airport, and navigating such variances at a pace that meets the airports’ needs and technology evolution can be challenging. The TRB Airport Cooperative Research Program's ACRP Synthesis 120: Airport Software Solutions and Services Sourcing identifies the efficient and innovative technology sourcing and procurement practices developed by airports. %0 Book %A National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine %E Taylor, Rachel M. %T Exploring Partnership Governance in Global Health: Proceedings of a Workshop–in Brief %D 2018 %U https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/24997/exploring-partnership-governance-in-global-health-proceedings-of-a-workshop %> https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/24997/exploring-partnership-governance-in-global-health-proceedings-of-a-workshop %I The National Academies Press %C Washington, DC %G English %K Health and Medicine %P 9 %X On October 26, 2017, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's Forum on Public–Private Partnerships for Global Health and Safety convened a workshop on the governance of global health partnerships. Collaboration, a common approach in both 21st-century engineering and global health, brings together the talents, experiences, and resources of multiple sectors, and the diversity of these sectors leads to creative solutions for tackling system challenges. In global health, collaboration frequently occurs through public–private partnerships (PPPs), with public and private parties sharing risks, responsibilities, and decision-making processes with the objective of collectively and more effectively addressing a common goal. PPPs include government and industry as well as partners from a range of other sectors. The workshop examined what role governance assumes in global health PPPs through presentations and discussion on transparency and accountability, operational challenges, legal considerations, barriers and strategies for engagement, examples of governance structures and lessons learned, and measurement. This publication briefly summarizes the presentations and discussions from the workshop. %0 Book %A National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine %T Report 2 on Tracking and Assessing Governance and Management Reform in the Nuclear Security Enterprise %@ 978-0-309-47287-6 %D 2018 %U https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25040/report-2-on-tracking-and-assessing-governance-and-management-reform-in-the-nuclear-security-enterprise %> https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25040/report-2-on-tracking-and-assessing-governance-and-management-reform-in-the-nuclear-security-enterprise %I The National Academies Press %C Washington, DC %G English %K Policy for Science and Technology %K Conflict and Security Issues %P 44 %X The congressionally mandated report A New Foundation for the Nuclear Enterprise (the “Augustine-Mies” report), released in November 2014, concluded that “the existing governance structures and many of the practices of the [nuclear security] enterprise are inefficient and ineffective, thereby putting the entire enterprise at risk over the long term.” Following the release of the Augustine-Mies report, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 called for DOE to develop an implementation plan for responding to the recommendations in that and similar reports. The NDAA also called for a 4 1⁄2-year study, joint between the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and the National Academy of Public Administration, to evaluate the implementation plan, to track the actions proposed in that plan, and to assess progress. This report is the second in a series of reports to be issued over 2017–2020 as part of that study. %0 Book %A National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine %T Report 3 on Tracking and Assessing Governance and Management Reform in the Nuclear Security Enterprise %@ 978-0-309-49040-5 %D 2019 %U https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25392/report-3-on-tracking-and-assessing-governance-and-management-reform-in-the-nuclear-security-enterprise %> https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25392/report-3-on-tracking-and-assessing-governance-and-management-reform-in-the-nuclear-security-enterprise %I The National Academies Press %C Washington, DC %G English %K Conflict and Security Issues %P 52 %X The congressionally mandated report A New Foundation for the Nuclear Enterprise (the "Augustine-Mies" report), released in November 2014, concluded that "the existing governance structures and many of the practices of the [nuclear security] enterprise are inefficient and ineffective, thereby putting the entire enterprise at risk over the long term." Following the release of the Augustine-Mies report, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 called for DOE to develop an implementation plan for responding to the recommendations in that and similar reports. The NDAA also called for a 4 1⁄2-year study, joint between the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and the National Academy of Public Administration, to evaluate the implementation plan, to track the actions proposed in that plan, and to assess progress. This report is the third in a series of reports to be issued over 2017–2020 as part of that study. %0 Book %A National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine %T Report 1 on Tracking and Assessing Governance and Management Reform in the Nuclear Security Enterprise %@ 978-0-309-45829-0 %D 2017 %U https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/24749/report-1-on-tracking-and-assessing-governance-and-management-reform-in-the-nuclear-security-enterprise %> https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/24749/report-1-on-tracking-and-assessing-governance-and-management-reform-in-the-nuclear-security-enterprise %I The National Academies Press %C Washington, DC %G English %K Energy and Energy Conservation %K Conflict and Security Issues %P 62 %X A congressionally mandated study carried out in 2013-2014 led to the November 2014 report A New Foundation for the Nuclear Enterprise. That report summarizes the panel’s findings on the current health of the enterprise, examines the root causes of its governance challenges, and offers the panel’s recommendations to address the identified problems. It concludes that the existing governance structures and many of the practices of the enterprise are inefficient and ineffective, thereby putting the entire enterprise at risk over the long term. It offers recommendations to put the entire nuclear security enterprise on a stronger footing. Recognizing the persistence of governance and management concerns, this report serves as an initial assessment of the implementation plan developed by the National Nuclear Security Administration and the Department Of Energy for addressing the recommendations from A New Foundation for the Nuclear Enterprise. There will be seven semi-annual interim reports to evaluate progress in implementing the plan. A final report will be issued at the end of the study to document the overall progress in executing the implementation plan, assess the effectiveness of the reform efforts under that plan, and recommend whether further action is needed. %0 Book %A Transportation Research Board %A National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine %T Airport Governance and Ownership %D 2009 %U https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/23010/airport-governance-and-ownership %> https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/23010/airport-governance-and-ownership %I The National Academies Press %C Washington, DC %G English %K Transportation and Infrastructure %P 71 %X TRB's Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) Legal Research Digest 7: Airport Governance and Ownership addresses the issue of essential powers to operate an airport; defines what airport governance includes; describes the advantages and disadvantages of the various governance structures; identifies and analyzes a number of projects where airports were transferred from one form of governance to another; and examines legal problems encountered during these transfers. %0 Book %A National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine %T A Review of the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives %@ 978-0-309-37985-4 %D 2016 %U https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/21829/a-review-of-the-landscape-conservation-cooperatives %> https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/21829/a-review-of-the-landscape-conservation-cooperatives %I The National Academies Press %C Washington, DC %G English %K Earth Sciences %P 150 %X The United States' tradition of conserving fish, wildlife, habitats, and cultural resources dates to the mid-19th century. States have long sought to manage fish and wildlife species within their borders, whereas many early federal conservation efforts focused on setting aside specific places as parks, sanctuaries, or reserves. With advances in landscape ecology over the past quarter-century, conservation planners, scientists, and practitioners began to stress the importance of conservation efforts at the scale of landscapes and seascapes. These larger areas were thought to harbor relatively large numbers of species that are likely to maintain population viability and sustain ecological processes and natural disturbance regimes - often considered critical factors in conserving biodiversity. By focusing conservation efforts at the level of whole ecosystems and landscape, practitioners can better attempt to conserve the vast majority of species in a particular ecosystem. Successfully addressing the large-scale, interlinked problems associated with landscape degradation will necessitate a planning process that bridges different scientific disciplines and across sectors, as well as an understanding of complexity, uncertainty, and the local context of conservation work. The landscape approach aims to develop shared conservation priorities across jurisdictions and across many resources to create a single, collaborative conservation effort that can meet stakeholder needs. Conservation of habitats, species, ecosystem services, and cultural resources in the face of multiple stressors requires governance structures that can bridge the geographic and jurisdictional boundaries of the complex socio-ecological systems in which landscape-level conservation occurs. The Landscape Conservation Cooperatives (LCC) Network was established to complement and add value to the many ongoing state, tribal, federal, and nongovernmental efforts to address the challenge of conserving species, habitats, ecosystem services, and cultural resources in the face of large-scale and long-term threats, including climate change. A Review of the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives evaluates the purpose, goals, and scientific merits of the LCC program within the context of similar programs, and whether the program has resulted in measurable improvements in the health of fish, wildlife, and their habitats. %0 Book %T Striking a Balance: Improving Stewardship of Marine Areas %@ 978-0-309-06369-2 %D 1997 %U https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/5797/striking-a-balance-improving-stewardship-of-marine-areas %> https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/5797/striking-a-balance-improving-stewardship-of-marine-areas %I The National Academies Press %C Washington, DC %G English %K Earth Sciences %P 192 %X America's ocean and coastal regions—which provide wildlife habitat, commercial fish stocks, mineral reserves, travelways, recreation, and more—are under increasing pressure as more and more people exploit marine resources, leaving environmental damage in their wake. Striking a Balance responds to the urgency for sound decision-making in the management of marine resources. An expert committee proposes principles, goals, and a framework for marine area governance, including new governance structures at the federal and regional levels and improvements for existing governing and regulatory systems. Recommendations include using tools—such as zoning and liability—for resolving conflicts between users, controlling access to marine resources, and enforcing regulations. The book describes the wide-ranging nature and value of marine resources, evaluates their current management, and explores three in-depth case studies. It also touches on the implications of newer, more flexible, less hierarchical approaches to organizational behavior. Striking a Balance will be of interest to everyone concerned about marine resource management, especially federal and state marine managers and regulators, marine scientists and policy analysts, companies and organizations with interests in marine and coastal resources, and advocacy groups. %0 Book %A National Research Council %T Science and Stewardship in the Antarctic %@ 978-0-309-04947-4 %D 1993 %U https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/2223/science-and-stewardship-in-the-antarctic %> https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/2223/science-and-stewardship-in-the-antarctic %I The National Academies Press %C Washington, DC %G English %K Earth Sciences %P 124 %X With the negotiation of the International Protocol on Environmental Protection in 1991, those nations conducting scientific research programs in Antarctica face new challenges for stewardship of the southern continent and protection of its environment. Science and Stewardship in the Antarctic examines how the implementation of the 1991 agreement in the United States can be done in such a way to ensure the compatibility of scientific and environmental protection goals in this global laboratory. The book also addresses the potential for the new requirements both to benefit and harm research activities in Antarctica. %0 Book %A Transportation Research Board %A National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine %E Steer, Stephen D. Van Beek, Ian Sample %E Inc., Richard Marchi, RFMarchi Aviation Consulting %T Policy and Planning Issues Roadmap Report %D 2019 %U https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25605/policy-and-planning-issues-roadmap-report %> https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25605/policy-and-planning-issues-roadmap-report %I The National Academies Press %C Washington, DC %G English %K Transportation and Infrastructure %P 41 %X Major technological and security changes in the aviation industry over the past 20 years have forced airport leaders and aviation stakeholders to think of new research ideas that will improve the planning and development of policies and new models that foster growth of air service, incorporate new airport and customer technology, revise airport business models, and better interact with neighboring communities.ACRP (Airport Cooperative Research Program) Web-Only Document 39: Policy and Planning Issues Roadmap Report is one of several Research Roadmap Reports that the ACRP commissioned to generate the research ideas that will help airports solve common problems, learn about new technologies, and assess innovations in services and operations.Planning and policy together represent one of 10 identified categories of research that directly involves and benefits the airport industry. Policy and planning issues are especially sensitive to developments in the aviation industry. For example, airport boards and executives may adopt new commercial strategies to raise additional airport revenues (an internal decision), while the FAA may change the criteria or funding levels for airport programs (an external decision).These Research Roadmaps augment the continuous ACRP solicitation process to airport industry practitioners for research ideas and problem statements. %0 Book %A National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine %E Taylor, Rachel M. %E Alper, Joe %T Exploring Partnership Governance in Global Health: Proceedings of a Workshop %@ 978-0-309-47434-4 %D 2018 %U https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25069/exploring-partnership-governance-in-global-health-proceedings-of-a-workshop %> https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25069/exploring-partnership-governance-in-global-health-proceedings-of-a-workshop %I The National Academies Press %C Washington, DC %G English %K Health and Medicine %P 130 %X Solving the world’s health challenges requires multidisciplinary collaborations that bring together the talents, experiences, resources, and ideas from multiple sectors. These collaborations in global health frequently occur through public–private partnerships (PPPs) in which public and private parties share risks, responsibilities, and decision-making processes with the objective of collectively and more effectively addressing a common goal. However, these numerous stakeholders bring varying strengths and resources to global health partnerships, but they also bring their own organizational cultures, regulations, and expectations. Managing partnerships among them is complex and requires intentional and thoughtful governance. Over the last several decades, as the number of interested stakeholders, resources invested, and initiatives launched within the global health field has grown, effective governance of global health PPPs has become increasingly critical. To explore the role of governance in PPPs for global health, the Forum on Public–Private Partnerships for Global Health and Safety convened a workshop. Participants explored best practices, common challenges, and lessons learned in the varying approaches to partnership governance. They also highlighted key issues in the governance of PPPs for global health with the goal of increasing their effectiveness in improving health outcomes. This publication summarizes the presentations and discussions from the workshop. %0 Book %A National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine %A National Academy of Medicine %E Sands, Peter %E Winters, Janelle %T Countering the Pandemic Threat Through Global Coordination on Vaccines: The Influenza Imperative %@ 978-0-309-08870-1 %D 2022 %U https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/26284/countering-the-pandemic-threat-through-global-coordination-on-vaccines-the %> https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/26284/countering-the-pandemic-threat-through-global-coordination-on-vaccines-the %I The National Academies Press %C Washington, DC %G English %K Health and Medicine %P 236 %X The COVID-19 pandemic has laid bare the fragility of the global system of preparedness and response to pandemics and the fragmentation of our research and development ecosystem. The pandemic has provided a disruptive moment to advance new norms and frameworks for influenza. It also has demonstrated how innovative global public-private partnerships and coordination mechanisms can lead to rapid successes in viral vaccine research, manufacturing, and risk pooling. Countering the Pandemic Threat Through Global Coordination on Vaccines identifies ways to strengthen pandemic and seasonal influenza global coordination, partnerships, and financing. This report presents seven overarching recommendations for how the urgent influenza threat should be conceptualized and prioritized within the global pandemic preparedness and response agenda in the future. %0 Book %A National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine %T Building Data Capacity for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research: Interim Report 2–Data Standards, Methods, and Policy %@ 978-0-309-27273-5 %D 2022 %U https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/26298/building-data-capacity-for-patient-centered-outcomes-research-interim-report %> https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/26298/building-data-capacity-for-patient-centered-outcomes-research-interim-report %I The National Academies Press %C Washington, DC %G English %K Computers and Information Technology %K Health and Medicine %K Behavioral and Social Sciences %P 86 %X The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE), in partnership with other agencies and divisions of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, coordinates a portfolio of projects that build data capacity for conducting patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR). PCOR focuses on producing scientific evidence on the effectiveness of prevention and treatment options to inform the health care decisions of patients, families, and health care providers, taking into consideration the preferences, values, and questions patients face when making health care choices. ASPE asked the National Academies to appoint a consensus study committee to identify issues critical to the continued development of the data infrastructure for PCOR. The committee's work will contribute to ASPE's development of a strategic plan that will guide their work related to PCOR data capacity over the next decade. As part of its information gathering activities, the committee organized three workshops to collect input from stakeholders on the PCOR data infrastructure. This report, the second in a series of three interim reports, summarizes the discussion and committee conclusions from the second workshop, focused on data standards, methods, and policies that could make the PCOR data infrastructure more useful in the years ahead. Participants in the workshop included researchers and policy experts working in these areas. %0 Book %A Institute of Medicine %E Taylor, Rachel M. %T Exploring Lessons Learned from Partnerships to Improve Global Health and Safety: Workshop in Brief %D 2015 %U https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/21690/exploring-lessons-learned-from-partnerships-to-improve-global-health-and-safety %> https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/21690/exploring-lessons-learned-from-partnerships-to-improve-global-health-and-safety %I The National Academies Press %C Washington, DC %G English %K Health and Medicine %P 8 %X Drawing on relevant perspectives from both the private and public sectors, the Forum on Public–Private Partnerships for Global Health and Safety (PPP Forum) held a workshop on November 18–19, 2014, to explore motivations, challenges, and lessons learned during four stages of partnerships: engagement, formation, operations, and knowledge management. Workshop objectives were to engage in forward-looking multisectoral dialogue on the evolving models of partnerships for improving global health and safety; to explore opportunities for identifying and applying lessons learned from experiences of success and failure; and to discuss how the evolving model of partnerships and lessons learned can impact the future state of global health and safety, help meet global developmental challenges, and sustain improved outcomes. This publication summarizes the presentations and discussions from the workshop. %0 Book %T Anticipating Goals 2000: Standards, Assessment, and Public Policy: Summary of a Workshop %D 1995 %U https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/9291/anticipating-goals-2000-standards-assessment-and-public-policy-summary-of %> https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/9291/anticipating-goals-2000-standards-assessment-and-public-policy-summary-of %I The National Academies Press %C Washington, DC %G English %K %P 36 %0 Book %A National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine %E Magsino, Sammantha %T Management Models for Future Seismological and Geodetic Facilities and Capabilities: Proceedings of a Workshop %@ 978-0-309-49619-3 %D 2019 %U https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25536/management-models-for-future-seismological-and-geodetic-facilities-and-capabilities %> https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25536/management-models-for-future-seismological-and-geodetic-facilities-and-capabilities %I The National Academies Press %C Washington, DC %G English %K Earth Sciences %P 96 %X Modern geoscience research informs many important decisions and projects, such as geological disaster preparation, natural resource extraction, and global development. This critical research relies on technology and collaboration at state-of-the-art seismological and geodetic facilities. Currently, these facilities provide a wide variety of observation systems that support scientists' understanding of Earth and its changing environmental systems. As emerging technologies develop rapidly, seismological and geodetic facilities have new capabilities and more complex management and research communication systems. This requires a reevaluation of management structures and best practices within these facilities. The National Academies convened a 1.5-day workshop to discuss management models of theoretical seismological and geodetic facilities of the future. Initial discussions built upon a 2015 Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology community workshop report, which identified current and future capabilities of these research facilities. Management models from other types of scientific facilities were used as a springboard for further discussions about management and decision-making models that could be applied to seismological and geodetic facilities. Workshop participants also emphasized the importance of distributing capabilities among multiple facilities. Lastly, this workshop explored complex management topics in these facilities including instrumentation, user support services, data management, education and outreach, and workforce development capabilities. This publication summarizes the presentations and discussions from the workshop. %0 Book %A Transportation Research Board %A National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine %T A New Vision of Mobility: Guidance to Foster Collaborative Multimodal Decision Making %D 2004 %U https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/22068/a-new-vision-of-mobility-guidance-to-foster-collaborative-multimodal-decision-making %> https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/22068/a-new-vision-of-mobility-guidance-to-foster-collaborative-multimodal-decision-making %I The National Academies Press %C Washington, DC %G English %K Transportation and Infrastructure %P 10 %X TRB’s Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) and National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) have jointly produced Research Results Digest TCRP 65/NCHRP 288 -- A New Vision of Mobility: Guidance to Foster Collaborative Multimodal Decision Making. The single digest summarizes the results of the first phase of a TCRP and NCHRP jointly funded project that will eventually produce a short document for popular distribution, serving as a guidance resource in a “handbook” format and a “compendium” of case examples upon which the guidance document is based.